It's likely that something will happen in any case. As a franchise, Destiny may as well be named "The Monkey's Paw: The Game."
I've been following the franchise's evolution from the alpha, so I can vouch for Bungie's string of poor choices.After playing the vanilla version of Destiny, I first believed that Bungie lacked experience in managing a long-term live service game, and even now, over seven years after the game's release, I still hold that opinion.
Look no farther than the current debate about sunsetting, which is still going strong and is centered on the idea of "sunsetting" outdated Destiny 2 gear and content. While opinions on the loss of material varied (some people were okay with it if it meant fewer files and backend bloat), opinions on the removal of gear were almost always unfavorable.
Pretty much everyone is in agreement here, including the subreddit and a sizable portion of content providers, as this thorough Reddit thread highlights. For the first time since the Eververse—a lore-based justification for microtransactions—went out of hand, the forum as a whole is unified. What altered? It was discovered that players would need to re-grind in order to replace the gear they previously had, which has always been a problem throughout Destiny history.
As a devoted player of Destiny , I feel that since Bungie left Activision, Destiny 2 has been going in a much worse way. The amount of content has decreased, microtransactions have increased, and more short-term "Destiny 1" design choices are being made. Though the game has always been sporadically activated by the community, something seems a little off this time. It is exceedingly uncommon to see almost everyone in unison like this.
Will the team give us the old-fashioned "we're listening" response? perhaps, this time, something quite different?
Bungie's This Week [Bungie.net]